Thoughts on the ESA Amendments Act of 2025
Comment Letter: Input for RFI on ESA Section 10 Conservation Benefit Agreements, Habitat Conservation Plans
Comments on “Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 10(a) Program Implementation; Development of Conservation Benefit Agreements and Habitat Conservation Plans, and Issuance of Associated Enhancement of Survival and Incidental Take Permits” (FWS-HQ-ES-2025-0049-0001)
The ESA Edit That Could Affect an $800 Million Species Offset Market and Undermine Decades of Tribal Salmon Recovery
Last month, EPIC submitted detailed public comments opposing a proposed federal rule that would weaken the Endangered Species Act by removing habitat destruction from the definition of "harm." If the Rule goes through, it has profound implications for the restoration economy and Tribal communities.
Comment: Opposition to the Proposed Rule to Rescind the Definition of "Harm" Under the Endangered Species Act
Comment: Opposition to the Proposed Rule to Rescind the Definition of "Harm" Under the Endangered Species Act
California’s restoration bottleneck deepens biodiversity debt
Fun Tidbits I Learned While Researching US Biodiversity Markets
Beetles in a Pay Stack: Stacking and Bundling in Biodiversity Credit Markets
The Worst Trump-Era ESA Changes are Gone
Species on the Move: Considering the Future of Conservation Banking in the Face of Climate Change
EPIC Featured: Markets for Valuing Biodiversity on the Climate Positive podcast
Three Steps Forward for Species Mitigation in 2023
EPIC submits ESA Sec. 4D comments to increase tribal sovereignty in natural resources
3 New Changes for Offsets under ESA Section 7 and 1 Very Old Holdout
Biodiversity Net Gain: Understanding the Most Ambitious Biodiversity Policy in the World
Species Mitigation Policies Are Totally Back!
Terrasos and the evolution of habitat banks in Colombia
The ‘Poison Pill’ in the Proposed Rule for Voluntary Species Conservation
Top 5 Changes in the New GRI Biodiversity Metric
Bald and Golden Eagles Enlist the Resistance

