How Are SRF Earmarks Impacting Your State?
Earmarks reduce long-term water infrastructure funding in 39 states over 20 years—and ALL states lose resources for technical assistance, program administration, support to state and local drinking water staff, and additional subsidies—the primary affordability tool for small, rural, and under-resourced communities. Over 20 years, earmarks will drain an estimated $19.4 billion from State Revolving Funds (SRFs), enough to finance roughly 5,700 water infrastructure projects.
Find your state factsheet below for state-specific impacts of SRF earmarks on your state. For the full analysis, read our national report on SRF earmarks.
Alabama | Alaska | Arizona | Arkansas | California | Colorado | Connecticut | Delaware | Florida | Georgia | Hawaii | Idaho | Illinois | Indiana | Iowa | Kansas | Kentucky | Louisiana | Maine | Maryland | Massachusetts | Michigan | Minnesota | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana | Nebraska | Nevada | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New Mexico | New York | North Carolina | North Dakota | Ohio | Oklahoma | Oregon | Pennsylvania | Rhode Island | South Carolina | South Dakota | Tennessee | Texas | Utah | Vermont | Virginia | Washington | West Virginia | Wisconsin | Wyoming
Alabama’s Earmarks Factsheet
Alaska’s Earmarks Factsheet
Arizona’s Earmarks Factsheet
Arkansas’s Earmarks Factsheet
California’s Earmarks Factsheet
Colorado’s Earmarks Factsheet
Connecticut’s Earmarks Factsheet
Delaware’s Earmarks Factsheet
Florida’s Earmarks Factsheet
Georgia’s Earmarks Factsheet
Hawaii’s Earmarks Factsheet
Idaho’s Earmarks Factsheet
Illinois’s Earmarks Factsheet
Indiana’s Earmarks Factsheet
Iowa’s Earmarks Factsheet
Kansas’s Earmarks Factsheet
Kentucky’s Earmarks Factsheet
Louisiana’s Earmarks Factsheet
Massachusetts’s Earmarks Factsheet

