How States Are Navigating Shrinking Federal Water Protections and a Fraying Disaster Safety Net
Co-written by Leanne Spaulding
Welcome to the second installment of our briefing series, “Restoration and Resilience at the Speed of Need,” that acknowledges the challenges to speeding up the implementation of nature-based solutions and reviews policy solutions that have either been implemented or are being proposed. If you missed our first brief, “Nature Moves. Our Rules Don’t. That’s the Problem,” read it here.
The narrowing of federal water protections is creating a regulatory gap, and states are deciding whether or not to fill it. EPIC is interested in accelerating nature-based solutions, such as gray-green-blue hybrid infrastructure and ecological restoration, and the different pathways, or lack thereof, that the federal government and states are exploring in response to the 2023 Sackett vs EPA decision. What seems apparent is that, regardless of political party, policymakers are interested in reducing flood risk. However, some are missing the connection between flood risk, nature- based solutions, and water protection. In this brief, we’re going to connect those dots.

