EPIC Comments on Alabama’s SFY26 General Supplemental, Lead Service Line Replacement, and Emerging Contaminants Draft Intended Use Plans
At EPIC, we are conducting a review of several states’ Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) programs. Through this process, we have gained a deeper understanding of how these programs are administered and how the presentation of information in state IUPs can be enhanced. While analyzing Alabama’s DWSRF program for our DWSRF Funding Tracker project, we’ve noted the following points about the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) administration of its DWSRF funds. Our intention is to support Alabama in its efforts to make its IUPs even more user-friendly and informative.
Summary of EPIC’s Recommendations:
Provide additional clarity on principal forgiveness caps for the General Supplemental program
Provide clarity on electronic submissions for public comments, and reopen public comment period in order to ensure accessibility
Ensure publication of both a comprehensive list of projects and a fundable list of projects
Include information on eligible costs on the project priority lists for EC
Reduce uncommitted funds through cross-consideration of projects across PPLs
Make more strategic use of set-asides to support communities and reduce uncommitted funds
Improve program transparency by providing clear information on SRF policy decisions discussed in the IUP

