How Are SRF Earmarks Impacting Your State?

Earmarks reduce long-term water infrastructure funding in 39 states—and most other states that receive earmarks still lose money over time. Over 20 years, earmarking will drain an estimated $19.4 billion from State Revolving Funds (SRFs), enough to finance roughly 5,700 water infrastructure projects. 

Find your state factsheet below for state-specific impacts of SRF earmarks on your state. For the full analysis, read our national report on SRF earmarks.

Alabama | Alaska | Arizona | Arkansas | California | Colorado | Connecticut | Delaware | Florida | Georgia | Hawaii | Idaho | Illinois | Indiana | Iowa | Kansas | Kentucky | Louisiana | Maine | Maryland | Massachusetts | Michigan | Minnesota | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana | Nebraska | Nevada | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New Mexico | New York | North Carolina | North Dakota | Ohio | Oklahoma | Oregon | Pennsylvania | Rhode Island | South Carolina | South Dakota | Tennessee | Texas | Utah | Vermont | Virginia | Washington | West Virginia | Wisconsin | Wyoming