Discover More

Some Myths and Misunderstandings in Biodiversity Credit Markets
Biodiversity credit markets are new and unfamiliar to most of us, and misconceptions abound. Because carbon credit markets have attracted so much attention - good, bad, and ugly, there is a (mostly) false impression that carbon markets are, or should be the single model for a biodiversity market, and that couldn’t be farther from the truth. I spoke recently as part of an excellent series on biodiversity credits hosted by the Environmental Leadership Training Initiative, and below I’ve adapted my comments from that event to address some of the myths and doubts often posed by both advocates and skeptics. If others come to mind, go ahead and throw them in the comments below.

Biodiversity Credit Principles

Building a Thriving Biodiversity Credit Market

Three Steps Forward for Species Mitigation in 2023

3 New Changes for Offsets under ESA Section 7 and 1 Very Old Holdout

New Paper: Biodiversity Net Gain

The Only Good Thing to Come out of Sackett v. EPA is the Epic Shade Thrown by the Dissenting Justices

Species Mitigation Policies Are Totally Back!

Terrasos and the evolution of habitat banks in Colombia

Top 5 Changes in the New GRI Biodiversity Metric

Top Kudos and Concerns about CA’s Resource Conservation Investment Strategies Program

New Year, New Definition of Waters of the United States

Bald and Golden Eagles Enlist the Resistance

Corporate Action on Biodiversity: Sweden

Major Themes from the Supreme Court’s Hearing of Sackett v EPA

Biodiversity: Europe is the Center for Policy Innovation

Buzzfeed Quiz

WOTUS Explainer

New Report: Promoting Tribal Roles in Providing Compensatory Mitigation Offsets
