Hiring for Key Technical Skill Sets

Increasing the share of roles focused on innovative technologies and practices is critical to finding novel solutions that accelerate environmental outcomes.

Key Insights

  • Hiring overall has been reduced drastically across agencies in our dataset in 2025. For example: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has reduced overall hiring and technologist hiring by 67% so far this year. Previously, USACE averaged 8,649 job postings per year from 2020 - 2024, with an average of 210 IT postings in that span. In the first half of 2025, the agency has posted 1,396 positions only 35 of which were for IT roles. Other agencies show similarly precipitous declines.

  • The percentage of overall hiring dedicated to technologists has dropped even more significantly than expected when looking at the overall numbers. As of Q2 2025, only 5/16 agencies in our combined dataset have IT hiring rates greater than 0.5%, most have been reduced to 0.00%. Only 2 environmental agencies have postings for any technologists: NOAA has 5 total openings, 3 for technologists and USGS has 12 total openings, 2 for technologists.

Technologist Hiring at Environmental and Benchmark Agencies Plummets in 2025*

*NOAA’s Q2 2025 data were a severe outlier and have been omitted from the chart to improve readability and interpretability. They posted five roles, three of which were IT positions, for a 60% IT hiring rate. Their data are included in all analyses.

The Why

Technologists with contemporary skills are an investment in the design, deployment, and management of advanced technological systems. Those systems are urgently needed to meaningfully accelerate progress on environmental missions. We can’t learn more about the potential environmental benefits of artificial intelligence or quantum computing without experimentation by qualified technologists. Hiring new technologists is critical to:

  • Cycle the latest and greatest skills, technologies, and methodologies into government.

  • Apply fresh eyes to longstanding, systemic challenges.

The How